Friday, September 5, 2008

Jakarta (IP) Bandwidth Price

I followed some traces left by Pak Meneer and was delivered to his records at Opisboy. This is claimed to be an "Informal ISP Technical ( dir-pji-like :p )" forum. Comments ? :-D Well, for non-local readers, "dir-pji" could be understood as "indonesian ISP Executives/VIPs" or as the forum of ISPs' owners/high-rank officials. It is "dir-pji-like" ? Personally, I would say "better-than-dir-pji" :-D Reasons? he..he..he. Don't take it seriously or even start thinking about that!! :-D

Back to bandwidth. According to Pak Meneer, the condition is as follows:

  • Jakarta - Singapore connection costs around USD 150 th./month (STM-1 closed circuit, clear channel); or
  • Jakarta - Singapore connection costs USD 1.5 mn/10 years (STM-1 closed circuit, clear channel, IRU scheme)
  • IP transit in SG costs around USD 60 - 100 /Mbps/month
From this numbers, he estimates that the cost of (budget necessary for) IP transit at Jakarta would be approx. USD 1,068/Mbps/month for normal scheme, or approx. USD 181/Mbps/month for IRU scheme.

This is more-or-less justified by several recent media reports (quoted information given by Indosat/Fadzri Santosa, APJII/Sylvia or others) which give the figure of around USD 1,000 /Mbps/month. Sylvia and Fadzri might talk on different contexts e.g. Fadzri mentioned closed-circuit leasing bandwidth and Sylvia talked about IP transit. But nevertheless, if we look at the numbers given by Meneer Tutut, cost component for transit doesn't contribute significantly. If Indosat plays in this price level, then I guess, Matrix and Moratel/XL would offer a bit cheaper price.

Regarding IRU scheme, I know that Matrix offers this scheme. But I doubt that Indosat does (will do)?? So, the information above may specific to Matrix. Right pak ?? :-D Some friends of mine have told me that Matrix has done a very good "marketing move". They may soon increase their currently-almost-full-booked 60 Gbps capacity. :-D However this might a spoiler, not official!

Last issue, many people use USD/Mbps metric for bandwidth price. I would personally prefer USD/X-port metric e.g. USD 2,000/E1-port rather than USD 1,000/Mbps. Why? Simply, because not all line bandwidth are useable for user data. If we are talking about STM-1 line for instance, if it is channelized, its useable bandwidth is only 126 Mbps. If it is unchannelized, by using PoS for instance, its useable bandwidth might be in the range of 130 - 140+ Mbps.

That's all. Sorry this time without pics. :-D

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails